Read the book
The Wild Leek Place
Seven feet of wet prairie decided a state line. A river was turned backwards. Eight hours became a demand. 844 died at a wharf in the name of a safety law.
Twenty-three chapters, every disagreement kept. Free, no sign-up.
Start at the ice →Or take it with you: EPUB · PDF. Same text as the web edition.
The book, chapter by chapter
From a million years ago to the name still spoken. Choose a chapter to start there.
- The ice
Begin about a million years ago, because the town could not have stood anywhere else and the reason is geological rather than commercial.

Glacial Lake Chicago and its outletUSGS, 1915 - Seven feet
The accident can be measured.

The 1673 voyage, with the portage markedThévenot, c. 1681 - The plant, and the name
The creek was named for what grew along it.

Wild leek, Allium tricoccumBritton & Brown, 1913 - The people the ground belonged to
The state's name is a second plain word doing unglamorous work, and the obvious reading of it is wrong.

Wa-Baun-See, a Potawatomi chiefMcKenney & Hall, 1842 - The French century
France reached this water road long before the United States built anything on it.

New France and the Illinois countryCoronelli, 1688 - Point de Sable
The first documented resident of the place was a Black man, and the city has his name wrong.

The Kinzie house, once Point de Sable's, in 1832Andreas, 1884 - The fort
The United States took the water road before it took anything else here, and it took it by treaty.

Old Fort Dearborn, built 1803Andreas, 1884 - The line on the map
Chicago is in Illinois because a man in Washington moved a line.

Illinois before the line moved northMelish, 1818 - Removal, and what stayed
The nations did not vanish; they were moved, in stages, and the record of it is dry.

Chicago in 1833Colbert, 1871 - The hinterland
The city's own boosters always located its cause somewhere else.

The Board of Trade floorHarper's, 1886 - The paper town
The town was a piece of paper before it was a town, and the paper is older than the removal this book has just described.

Thompson's plat of the townJames Thompson, 1830 - Raising the city
The decisive work of the next fifteen years was done downward, and the baseline it started from was mud.

Raising the Briggs Houseengraving, c. 1857–66 - Who was free in it
While the city was raising its streets it was also arguing about who was free standing on them, and that argument ran in both directions at once.

John JonesAaron E. Darling, c. 1865 - The fire
On the night of 8 October 1871 the city burned, and it burned as a system, not as an accident.

Chicago in FlamesCurrier & Ives, 1871 - Eight hours
Organised labour enters most histories of this city twice, as a bomb and as a boycott, and leaves as a footnote to both.

The bomb at HaymarketHarper's Weekly, 1886 - The White City and the ditch
In 1893 Chicago showed the world a white classical city built on made ground at Jackson Park.

The Court of HonorOfficial Views, 1893 - The trade the city licensed
Chicago was selling something else the whole time, and the record of it is unusually good, because the city kept trying to decide whether the trade…

The Vice Commission's report1911 - The reversal
Chicago's water problem was inherited, not made.

The Sanitary and Ship CanalSanitary District, 1904 - What the city says about itself
Official self-description is a genre of evidence in its own right, because the gap between what a city says of itself and what its record shows is…

The civic center the Plan proposedJules Guérin, 1909 - Who counted whom
Chicago's first population figures were not counted at all.

The riot of July 1919press photograph, 1919 - What the record does not carry
A store like this one keeps discovering things about itself, and they add up to an argument the rest of this history only implies.

The burned Court HouseC. R. Clark, 1871 - Who the book was for
The record does not only fail.

Andreas's History of Chicago1884 - The name, still spoken
The usual ending for this story is that an Indigenous name was worn smooth into something meaningless, carried now by people with no idea it was ever…

The Chicago RiverDetroit Publishing Co., c. 1900
The name
Chicago is not an English word, and it does not mean anything in English. It is a plant.
The Miami-Illinois word šikaakwa is the word for the striped skunk, extended to the wild leek that grew thick in the wet ground along the river. It named the river first — Šikaakwa Siipiiwi — then the place where that river meets the lake: Šikaakonki, the Wild Leek Place. The French wrote down what they thought they heard, in French.
Myaamia people call the city Šikaakonki today. The word was never lost. What was lost was the knowing, and only on one side.
Chicago spent a century arguing onion against polecat — declared banished in 1902, printed as “bad smell” in a 1912 history, left unsettled in 1929. They were arguing over nothing: it is one word. Every step of the quarrel is in the store, with its quotes, filed as a “conflict” rather than tidied away.
The store behind it
Every row is checkable, carries its source, and carries how far that source can be trusted. Nothing is smoothed — where the record disagrees with itself, the disagreement is what gets recorded.
It runs from a glacier to a Supreme Court case to a 2024 return of land into trust. Searchable by keyword and, because nobody in 1812 wrote “ethnic cleansing” or “supply chain”, by meaning as well.
Same rules as the sister work on the Maumee: sources named, disagreements recorded rather than resolved, legend labelled as legend, burial grounds never sharpened, and no claim made on behalf of the dead that the record will not carry. Kekionga and Shikaakwa sat at opposite ends of the same water road.

